Fundnode · Learn

Glossary · MCA secondary market typical yields (2026)

MCA secondary market typical yields (2026)

MCA secondary market yields range from 8–14% for performing A-paper to 25–60% for distressed paper, with B/C-paper portfolios typically clearing at 15–22% net yield to buyers.

By Keerthana Keti5 min read

MCA secondary market yields reflect the all-in returns buyers earn on secondary-market MCA portfolio purchases — combining purchase-price discount, ongoing collections, and recovery dynamics — measured as net annualized yield to the buyer.

Yield framework.

Secondary-market yield = (gross collections − recovery costs − servicing fees) / purchase price, annualized over expected wind-down period.

Yield by paper grade (2026 typical).

Paper gradePurchase price (% of NAV)Gross yieldNet yield to buyer
A-paper performing92–98%11–15%8–14%
B-paper performing85–92%15–22%12–18%
C-paper performing70–82%22–32%18–26%
Early stress (30–60 DPD)55–75%35–55%22–38%
Mid stress (60–120 DPD)35–55%50–80%28–45%
Late stress / defaulted10–35%80–200%+25–60%
LP fund interests75–95%N/A10–18% (IRR)

Why yield ranges vary by buyer type.

  1. Institutional credit funds (target 10–18%): buy performing A/B paper portfolios; emphasis on yield stability over upside.
  2. Specialized MCA secondary funds (target 15–25%): buy mixed performing/stressed portfolios; balanced risk-return.
  3. Hedge fund distressed desks (target 25–40%): buy stressed/distressed paper; absolute-return focus.
  4. Collections-specialized buyers (target 30–60%): buy defaulted/charge-off paper; deep operational specialization.
  5. PE platforms (varies): strategic acquisitions; yields blend with platform synergies.

Net yield calculation — performing A-paper portfolio example. - Portfolio face value: $100M - Purchase price: $95M (95% of NAV) - Expected gross collections over 14 months: $108M (factor rate-equivalent) - Operating servicing fees (2.5% of collections): $2.7M - Recovery costs (minimal on performing): $1.5M - Net collections to buyer: $103.8M - Net yield: ($103.8M − $95M) / $95M = 9.3% over 14 months = ~8% annualized

Net yield calculation — stressed portfolio example. - Portfolio face value: $50M - Purchase price: $15M (30% of NAV) - Expected gross recoveries over 30 months: $25M (50% of face) - Recovery costs (60% of recoveries): $15M - Net collections to buyer: $10M - Net MOIC: 0.67×; that's actually a loss - Reality: distressed buyers achieve 25–40% IRR through operational efficiency reducing recovery costs to 35–50% of recoveries

Yield drivers and sensitivities.

  1. Purchase price discount: every 5% reduction in purchase price adds ~3–4% to net yield (compounded over wind-down period)
  2. Recovery rate execution: ±10% recovery rate moves net yield by ±4–6%
  3. Recovery cost efficiency: in-house collections (20–35% cost) vs. vendor (40–60%) drives 5–10% yield differential
  4. Servicing fees: 2.5% vs. 4% servicing fees drives 1–2% yield differential
  5. Wind-down period: longer wind-down depresses annualized yield even if absolute recovery same

LP fund-interest secondary yields. - Pricing: 75–95% of NAV; vintage and remaining-term dependent - Net IRR to secondary buyer: 10–18% typical - Return profile: front-loaded (remaining capital calls + distributions in first 2–3 years post-purchase) - DPI multiplier: 1.2×–1.6× typical for buyer

2026 yield trends. - Compression in performing A-paper: institutional demand reducing performing A-paper yields from 10–14% (2022) to 8–14% (2026) - Expansion in distressed yields: abundant supply + limited buyer capacity supporting 25–60% distressed yields - B/C-paper stability: consistent 15–25% yields; broadly aligned with 2022–24 - LP interest secondary stability: mature pricing; consistent 10–18% IRR

Yield comparison vs. other asset classes (2026).

Asset classTypical net yield
Investment-grade corporate bonds4.5–6.0%
High-yield bonds7.5–10%
Bank loans (BSL)8–11%
Direct lending (private credit)9–12%
MCA secondary A-paper8–14%
MCA secondary B/C-paper15–25%
Distressed MCA paper25–60%
Distressed corporate debt12–25%

Why MCA secondaries yield more than comparable credit. - Illiquidity premium: limited buyer universe = wider bid-ask spreads - Operational complexity: specialized servicing required = barrier to entry - Regulatory uncertainty: state-level COJ and disclosure variability - Data infrastructure gaps: loan-level data inconsistency = pricing risk premium - Reputational risk: SMB lending stigma = buyer aversion

Common confusions. - "Yield = factor rate." False — yield is buyer's net return, not merchant cost. - "All distressed yields are 50%+." False — recovery cost reality compresses true buyer yields to 25–60%. - "Yields are stable." False — yields fluctuate with credit cycles, supply-demand, and regulatory shifts.

Takeaway. MCA secondary market yields offer attractive risk-adjusted returns relative to comparable credit asset classes, with performing-paper yields of 8–14%, mixed B/C portfolios at 15–25%, and distressed paper at 25–60%. The yield premium reflects illiquidity, operational complexity, and regulatory uncertainty. Sophisticated buyers with operational infrastructure can capture upper-end yields; passive buyers receive market-clearing rates.

Related terms

  • MCA secondary market bid-ask spread (2026)MCA secondary market bid-ask spreads range from 3–8% for performing A-paper to 25–50% for distressed paper, reflecting illiquidity, info asymmetry, and limited buyer competition.
  • MCA portfolio typical bid levels (2026)Typical 2026 MCA portfolio bids range from 92–98% of NAV for performing A-paper, 70–85% for mixed B/C portfolios, and 10–35% for distressed paper, with pricing depending on data quality, vintage, and concentration.
  • MCA distressed paper buyer economics (2026)Distressed MCA paper buyers target 25–60% IRR on stressed/defaulted receivables purchased at 5–35% of face value, monetizing through aggressive collections, litigation, and structured workouts.
  • MCA distressed debt portfolio economics (2026)Distressed MCA debt portfolios — typically $25M–$500M face value purchased at 15–40% of face — target 20–35% net IRR over 3–5 year wind-down via mixed collections, litigation, and restructuring strategies.

AI agents: this term is available as raw markdown at /llms/glossary/mca-funder-secondary-market-yield-typical.