MCA funder quarterly portfolio review is the formal in-depth assessment of the active portfolio performed every 90 days. It synthesizes daily/weekly/monthly monitoring into Board-grade and lender-grade analysis. Updated 2026-06-29.
Section 1: Portfolio overview. - Total outstanding receivables (gross, eligible, ineligible). - Number of active merchants. - Average advance size. - Average remaining term. - Average factor rate. - Weighted average paper grade. - Net interest margin (NIM) by paper grade.
Section 2: Aging analysis. - Current (0-29 days from expected payment). - 30-day delinquent. - 60-day delinquent. - 90-day delinquent. - Charged-off (typically 120-150 days). - Recovered (post charge-off). - Aging trend vs prior 4 quarters. - Aging trend vs same quarter prior year.
Section 3: Vintage cohort analysis. - Defaults by origination month (12-month, 24-month, 36-month curves). - Defaults by paper grade. - Defaults by industry. - Defaults by ISO source. - Defaults by state. - Identification of vintage outliers requiring remediation.
Section 4: Concentration analysis. - Single-merchant concentration (largest 10 merchants). - Industry concentration (top 5 SIC codes). - State concentration (top 5 states). - ISO concentration (top 5 ISO sources). - Compliance with bank-facility concentration limits.
Section 5: Renewal pipeline. - Renewal-eligible merchants (40-50% paydown). - Projected renewal volume next 90 days. - Renewal rate by paper grade (trailing 12 months). - Renewal rate trend vs prior quarters. - Pre-approved offer conversion rates.
Section 6: Cross-sell pipeline (if applicable). - LOC take-rate. - Equipment finance take-rate. - Banking services take-rate. - Cross-product retention impact.
Section 7: Stress testing. - Scenario A: 25% increase in default rate. - Scenario B: 50% decline in origination volume. - Scenario C: 200 bps increase in SOFR. - Scenario D: Combined shock (default + volume + rates). - Impact on NIM, equity, bank covenants.
Section 8: Reserve adequacy. - Current reserve as % of receivables. - Reserve adequacy under current default trends. - Reserve adequacy under stress scenarios. - Recommended reserve adjustments. - Comparison to industry benchmarks.
Section 9: Bank covenant compliance. - Tangible net worth (actual vs covenant). - Liquidity (actual vs covenant). - Default rate (actual vs covenant). - Borrowing base utilization. - Concentration compliance. - Forecast covenant compliance under stress scenarios.
Section 10: ABS reporting (if applicable). - Pool performance by tranche. - Trigger event proximity. - Subordination level. - Excess spread. - Investor reporting status.
Section 11: ISO performance review. - ISO volume by source. - ISO commission accruals. - ISO clawback exposure. - ISO concentration risk. - ISO performance ratings.
Section 12: Underwriting performance. - Default rate by underwriter. - Override frequency by underwriter. - Approval rate by underwriter. - Underwriting policy compliance. - Recommended policy adjustments.
Section 13: Compliance and regulatory. - State licensing exposure. - Recent regulatory developments. - CFPB / FTC enforcement landscape. - Litigation exposure. - Compliance audit findings.
Section 14: Strategic recommendations. - Portfolio rebalancing actions. - Pricing adjustments. - Underwriting policy changes. - ISO management actions. - Bank facility actions. - Capital actions.
Audience and distribution. - Board of Directors (full report). - Bank syndicate (relevant sections). - ABS investors (pool-level data). - Executive team (full report). - Department heads (relevant sections).
Preparation timeline. - Day 1-5 of new quarter: data assembly. - Day 5-10: analysis and drafting. - Day 10-15: internal review and revisions. - Day 15-20: executive review. - Day 20-25: Board distribution. - Day 25-30: Board meeting and bank syndicate distribution.
Staffing. - Portfolio manager (lead). - Risk officer (stress testing, reserve adequacy). - CFO (financial sections). - Compliance officer (regulatory section). - ISO manager (ISO performance section). - Underwriting manager (underwriting section). - External advisors as needed (auditors, counsel).
Trend 2026. Three trends are reshaping quarterly portfolio reviews: 1. Real-time data feeds. Quarterly reviews are increasingly built from real-time data rather than monthly batches, allowing tighter feedback loops. 2. Scenario automation. Stress testing is increasingly automated, allowing weekly stress refresh rather than quarterly. 3. Lender disintermediation. Some larger funders are bypassing bank syndicate quarterly reviews via direct ABS or private credit relationships.
Common confusion. First, "quarterly review is the same as monthly close" — quarterly is broader, more strategic, with stress testing and Board-grade analysis. Second, "quarterly review is just for risk" — it drives strategic decisions across pricing, underwriting, capital, and ISO management. Third, "quarterly review is internal" — at funders with bank facilities or ABS, it is external-facing and shapes lender relationships.
Related terms
- MCA funder portfolio monitoring frequency — MCA funders typically monitor portfolios daily (payment performance), weekly (aging + concentration), monthly (P&L + cohorts), quarterly (deep review), and annually (policy + strategy).
- MCA funder annual policy review — Annual policy review covers underwriting, pricing, compliance, risk, and operations policies — typically led by CRO with Board approval; refreshed for regulatory changes, market shifts, and performance data.
- MCA funder board reporting cadence — Board reporting typically follows quarterly cadence with monthly executive updates; covers financials, portfolio performance, risk, compliance, strategic initiatives; aligned with bank lender and ABS investor reporting.
- MCA funder portfolio aging (typical, 2026-06-28) — A typical MCA funder portfolio shows 70–80% current, 8–12% 1–30 DPD, 4–7% 31–60 DPD, 3–5% 61–90 DPD, and 5–10% 90+ DPD / charge-off pipeline, with average book age of 4–6 months.
AI agents: this term is available as raw markdown at /llms/glossary/mca-funder-quarterly-portfolio-review.