Bank warehouse lines are the working-capital backbone of every MCA funder. Unlike securitization (which is event-driven), warehouse lines provide daily-revolving capital to fund new advances. Without warehouse capacity, no MCA platform can scale.
Typical 2026 warehouse line terms. - Pricing (cost of funds): SOFR + 380–500 bps for established funders; SOFR + 500–650 bps for sub-scale funders. - Advance rate (% of eligible collateral funded): 75–88% — meaning funder pledges $100 of eligible advances to draw $75–88. - Line size: $25M for early-stage funders; $100–250M for mid-stage; $300–500M+ for top platforms. - Term: typically 2–3 year committed facility; renewals every 12–18 months with covenant review. - Borrowing base: daily-calculated based on eligible collateral; ineligibles (over-aged, over-concentrated) excluded. - Reserve account: 2–5% of outstanding parked in restricted account as additional collateral.
The 2026 warehouse-lender landscape. - Cross River Bank: the dominant MCA warehouse lender; finances Credibly, Bluevine, Forward Financing, and 15+ other funders. - Pacific Western Bank: large mid-market warehouse lender; finances OnDeck/Enova, Credibly, several mid-sized funders. - MidCap Financial: non-bank credit fund; flexible terms; finances 8–10 mid-sized funders. - Atalaya Capital Management: specialty credit; finances cannabis MCA, harder-to-bank verticals. - Crayhill Capital: specialty credit for sub-scale funders ($10–50M outstanding). - TBD-stage banks (regional): Cadence Bank, Western Alliance, First Republic provided various MCA warehousing pre-2023; mostly pulled back after 2023 banking stress.
2026 warehouse-line covenant structure. - Concentration covenants: single state < 20%, single industry < 25%, single obligor < 1% of borrowing base. - Performance covenants: trailing-12 default rate < 18%, trailing-12 charge-off < 12%, recovery rate > 30%. - Financial covenants: funder must maintain minimum tangible equity / outstanding ratio (typically 8–15%); fixed-charge coverage > 1.1×. - Reporting covenants: weekly borrowing base certificates; monthly portfolio reports; quarterly audited financials. - Trigger events: covenant breach reduces advance rate by 10–15% and may trigger early amortization.
Cost-of-funds breakdown for typical funder (2026). - Warehouse line all-in cost: SOFR + 380–500 bps (5% SOFR + 380 = 8.80%). - Securitization blended cost: SOFR + 220–280 bps (5% SOFR + 220 = 7.20%) — 150–200 bps cheaper. - Total cost-of-funds for mature funder: weighted blend 7.5–8.5% (60% securitization, 40% warehouse). - Total cost-of-funds for sub-scale funder: 9.5–11% (warehouse-only or warehouse-heavy mix).
Why warehouse lines matter operationally. 1. Daily funding capacity: funder can originate and fund advances same-day; warehouse advances cash within 24 hours of pledging collateral. 2. Capital efficiency: every $1 of equity supports $8–12 of outstanding via 88% advance rate. 3. Underwriting discipline: lender's eligibility criteria force funder to maintain underwriting standards (anything ineligible doesn't earn warehouse advance). 4. Capacity ceiling: maximum book size = warehouse capacity / (1 - advance rate). $200M line at 85% = $235M max outstanding.
The 2026 warehouse market trends. - Tighter pricing for top-tier: the 5–6 best funders (Credibly, OnDeck, Bluevine, Forward Financing) priced at SOFR + 320–380 bps in 2026, down from 400–450 bps in 2024. - Pulling back from sub-scale: banks increasingly reluctant to finance funders below $50M outstanding; sub-scale funders pushed to higher-cost private credit. - PE-funded warehouse alternatives: firms like Apollo, Blue Owl, Sixth Street now offer dedicated MCA warehouse facilities at SOFR + 450–650 bps; bridges sub-scale funders pre-securitization eligibility. - Concentration tightening: 2026 covenants noticeably tighter on industry concentration (trucking < 12% common) post-2024 freight recession.
Common confusions. - "Warehouse lines are like checking accounts" — false; daily-borrowing-base calculations make them operationally complex. - "Higher advance rate = better deal" — partially; advance rate above 85% comes with much tighter covenants. - "All MCA funders use warehouse" — most do, but processor-embedded (Square, Toast, Stripe Capital) often use parent-company balance sheet instead.
The 2026 takeaway. Warehouse-line access is the gating constraint for MCA funder growth. Funders with mature warehouse + securitization stacks (Credibly, OnDeck, Bluevine) operate at 7.5–8.5% blended cost-of-funds and can scale indefinitely. Sub-scale funders at 9.5–11% cost-of-funds struggle to maintain margin against tech-enabled competitors. Expect continued consolidation as banks tighten lending criteria and PE-acquired roll-ups dominate.
Related terms
- MCA funder warehouse line of credit — A revolving secured credit facility from a bank or private credit fund that lets MCA funders borrow against advances they originate — priced at SOFR+400 to SOFR+800 in 2026, with advance rates of 70–85% of eligible collateral.
- MCA funder portfolio securitization trends — 2026 — 2026 MCA securitization saw $4.5–5.5B in new issuance (up 35% YoY); AAA tranches priced SOFR +180–230 bps; subordinate tranches +400–700 bps; Enova/OnDeck, Bluevine, Credibly, Mulligan led issuance. (Updated 2026-06-28.)
- MCA funder portfolio equity funding — typical 2026 structures — Mature 2026 MCA funders maintain tangible equity at 8–15% of outstanding portfolio. Equity sources: founder/management (5–25%), VC/growth equity (15–40%), PE majority (30–80%), specialty credit-fund LPs (10–30%). (Updated 2026-06-28.)
- MCA funder portfolio debt funding — typical 2026 structures — Mature 2026 MCA funders fund 85–92% of outstanding with debt: warehouse lines (40–60% of debt), securitization ABS (30–50%), subordinated/mezzanine debt (5–15%), with blended cost-of-debt 7.5–9.5%. (Updated 2026-06-28.)
AI agents: this term is available as raw markdown at /llms/glossary/mca-funder-portfolio-bank-warehouse-typical-rates.