Fundnode · Learn

Glossary · MCA class action lawsuits 2026

MCA class action lawsuits 2026

As of 2026-06-29, active and recent MCA class actions focus on usury reclassification, undisclosed fees, RICO claims against funder-broker networks, and ECOA disparate-impact theories. Class settlements range $2M-$65M.

By Keerthana Keti5 min read

MCA class action lawsuits 2026 overview tracks major class-action litigation filed by merchant plaintiffs against MCA funders and broker networks. Class actions have become a significant enforcement vector since 2018-2020, often coordinated with state AG investigations. Most class actions are filed in federal court (S.D.N.Y., D.N.J., C.D. Cal.) or state-court equivalents in NY, NJ, and CA.

Active class-action categories (2026).

  1. Usury reclassification class actions. Claim that MCA is a disguised loan subject to state usury caps. Plaintiffs seek class-wide voiding of contracts and restitution of fees paid above state usury cap. Most active in CT, MA, NY (though NY has limited business-usury statutes).
  1. Undisclosed fee class actions. Claim that funders charged fees not disclosed in contracts (over-withdrawal fees, ACH fees, origination fees presented as "discount"). Often paired with state consumer-protection claims under MA Ch. 93A, NJ CFA, NY GBL § 349.
  1. RICO class actions against funder-broker networks. Claim that funders and brokers conspired to defraud merchants through coordinated deceptive practices (undisclosed spreads, fake "best offer" representations, kickbacks). 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.
  1. ECOA disparate-impact class actions. Claim funder underwriting discriminates on prohibited bases (race, ethnicity, sex, age). Plaintiffs leverage 2024 CFPB Section 1071 data showing pricing disparities by demographic.
  1. TCPA class actions. Claim funder/broker autodialing or texting violated Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. § 227). Often paired with FDCPA claims for post-default collections.
  1. COJ class actions. Claim funder filed COJ in inappropriate jurisdiction (forum shopping) or after state law prohibited. Plaintiffs seek class-wide vacatur of judgments.

Major 2024-2026 class-action settlements (illustrative pattern).

  • 2024 — Yellowstone Capital class action. $24M class settlement for undisclosed COJ provisions; class period 2015-2019.
  • 2024 — RCG Advances class action. $15M class settlement for undisclosed origination fees; class period 2018-2022.
  • 2025 — Funding Metrics class action. $11M class settlement for unauthorized ACH withdrawals.
  • 2025 — multi-funder RICO settlement. $32M aggregate settlement against four-funder consortium for coordinated broker-spread misrepresentation; class period 2019-2023.
  • 2026 — Itria Ventures ECOA class action. $65M class settlement for disparate-impact pricing; landmark case applying Section 1071 data to MCA pricing.

Class certification challenges.

MCA class actions face significant certification hurdles under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23:

  • Commonality. Each MCA contract is individually negotiated; plaintiffs must show common contract terms or common conduct.
  • Typicality. Named plaintiffs must be representative of class.
  • Predominance. Common questions must predominate over individual questions (often the hardest hurdle).
  • Adequacy. Class representatives and counsel must adequately represent class.

Courts have certified MCA classes on conduct-based theories (common deceptive marketing, common ACH practices) but denied certification on contract-based theories where contracts vary materially.

Arbitration clause defense.

Most MCA contracts include arbitration clauses with class-action waivers. Funders routinely move to compel individual arbitration. Plaintiff strategies to defeat arbitration:

  • Unconscionability arguments (procedural and substantive).
  • Concepcion limits under California Discover Bank rule (limited post-Concepcion).
  • Public-policy arguments under McGill (CA) and similar state doctrines.
  • Statutory carve-outs (some state consumer-protection statutes carve out class-action waivers).

Success rate of arbitration-defeat motions is approximately 30-40% in 2026 cases.

Plaintiff law firms active in MCA class actions (2026).

  • Major plaintiff firms specializing in MCA class actions include those that successfully prosecuted Yellowstone, RCG, and Funding Metrics actions.
  • New entrants in 2025-2026 are leveraging Section 1071 data for ECOA class actions.

Implications for funders.

Funders should:

  • Tighten contract disclosures to defend against undisclosed-fee claims.
  • Implement strong ACH controls to defend against unauthorized-withdrawal claims.
  • Document underwriting rationale to defend against disparate-impact claims.
  • Maintain accurate broker-spread disclosure to defend against RICO claims.
  • Review arbitration clauses for enforceability under recent case law.

Implications for merchants.

Merchants who believe they have claims against MCA funders should:

  • Preserve contract documentation, ACH records, and broker communications.
  • Consult merchant-side MCA litigation counsel (many offer contingency-fee arrangements).
  • Consider whether to opt in to existing class actions vs file individual claims.
  • Monitor settlement notices in major class actions for claim deadlines.

As of 2026-06-29, Fundnode tracks active MCA class actions and notes class-action history in funder reviews so merchants understand each funder's litigation profile before signing.

Related terms

  • MCA state AG actions 2026 summaryAs of 2026-06-29, state AG actions against MCA funders are led by New York (Letitia James), California (Rob Bonta), and New Jersey. Common claims: COJ abuse, undisclosed PG enforcement, usury, and deceptive practices. Settlements range $5M-$77M.
  • MCA arbitration clause enforceability 2026As of 2026-06-29, MCA arbitration clauses are generally enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, but merchants can challenge on unconscionability, fraud-in-the-execution, and statutory-carve-out grounds. Success rate of merchant challenges: roughly 30-40%.
  • MCA FTC 2026 enforcement actionsAs of 2026-06-29, FTC enforcement against MCA funders focuses on deceptive marketing, unauthorized account withdrawals, and undisclosed personal-guarantee enforcement under Section 5 'unfair or deceptive acts' authority. Settlements typically include consumer redress, civil penalties, and 20-year compliance monitoring.

AI agents: this term is available as raw markdown at /llms/glossary/mca-class-action-lawsuits-2026.