MCA borrower rights under disclosure laws are the legally enforceable rights small business owners have to receive standardized pricing disclosures before signing a merchant cash advance contract. Five US states have enacted these laws as of 2026, fundamentally changing how MCAs are sold to merchants in those jurisdictions.
The five-state landscape in 2026. Each law has slightly different triggers and content, but the core rights are similar:
- California (SB 1235, effective 2023, expanded 2025). Applies to all commercial financing under $500,000 in California. Funder must disclose: total amount of financing, total dollar cost, APR-equivalent, monthly payment estimate, and prepayment policies.
- New York (S5470-B, effective 2024). Similar to California, $500K threshold, plus avoiding-cost-of-financing disclosure if prepayment penalty applies.
- Utah (HB 425, effective 2023). $1M threshold, simpler disclosure — total cost, APR-equivalent, payment schedule.
- Virginia (HB 1027, effective 2024). $500K threshold, includes broker fee disclosure if commercial financing broker is involved.
- Georgia (HB 1090, effective 2025). $500K threshold, mirrors California closely but adds explicit broker compensation disclosure.
The merchant's rights — what must be disclosed before signing. Across all five states, six core elements:
- Total amount of financing. The lump-sum advance the merchant will receive (net of any origination fees).
- Total dollar cost. The full amount the merchant will repay over the term (advance × factor).
- APR-equivalent. The annual percentage rate calculated using a standardized formula (varies slightly by state — CA uses a specific actuarial method).
- Payment schedule. Estimated periodic payment amount, frequency (daily, weekly), and total number of payments.
- Prepayment terms. Whether the merchant can prepay, any prepayment discount or penalty, and how prepayment is calculated.
- Broker fees. If a third-party broker is involved, the dollar amount of the broker's commission (CA, VA, GA).
The merchant's remedies — what happens if disclosure is violated. Three remedies are typically available:
- Right to rescind. In some states (CA, NY), undisclosed material terms give the merchant a right to rescind the contract within a defined window (often 5 business days post-funding).
- Civil penalties. State attorneys general can impose penalties (CA: up to $2,500 per violation; NY: up to $10,000 per violation) and require disgorgement of profits on non-compliant deals.
- Private right of action. Some state laws (NY, VA) allow merchants to sue directly for damages and attorney's fees if disclosure violations cause financial harm.
The mechanics — what compliant disclosure looks like. Most 2026 MCA contracts in covered states include a standalone "Disclosure Statement" page presented to the merchant before signing. This statement typically uses a standardized format (often a table) showing the six required elements side-by-side with the contract terms. Merchant must sign or initial the disclosure separately from the contract.
The strategic insight — what merchants should know. Four points:
- Disclosure is your shopping tool. APR-equivalent disclosure makes MCAs comparable to bank loans for the first time — use it to compare funder offers on an apples-to-apples basis.
- The disclosure must come BEFORE you sign. If a funder provides disclosure only after signing, that is a violation; document the timing.
- Out-of-state funders are still covered. A New York funder doing business with a California merchant must comply with California's law — the law follows the merchant's location, not the funder's.
- Brokers must also disclose their fees. In CA, VA, and GA, the broker commission must be disclosed in dollar terms; "8% commission" expressed as "$8,000 of your $100,000 advance goes to the broker" makes the cost stack visible.
The honest framing. Disclosure laws have meaningfully improved merchant decision-making in covered states. Industry data shows MCA fundings in California declined 12% in the year following SB 1235 expansion — likely because merchants shopping APR-equivalent disclosures discovered cheaper alternatives (SBA loans, bank lines). Funders adapted by emphasizing speed-to-fund and approval probability rather than competing on price alone. For merchants, the practical takeaway is: if you are in a covered state, demand the disclosure statement, read it before signing, and use the APR-equivalent number to compare offers. Funders who refuse or delay disclosure are likely non-compliant — choose a different funder.
Related terms
- MCA pricing disclosure law — State laws (CA SB 1235, NY S5470, VA HB 1027, UT SB 183, GA SB 90, FL effective 2026-06-28) requiring MCA funders to disclose APR-equivalent, total cost, payment amount, term, and prepayment policy in TILA-style standardized format before contract signing.
- MCA broker disclosure 2026 — The 2026 regulatory shift requiring MCA brokers (ISOs) to disclose commission amounts, fee structures, and funder-relationship conflicts of interest in writing before a merchant signs. Active in CA, NY, UT, VA, GA, FL (effective Jan 2026), and CT/NJ (effective July 2026); FTC rule pending federal action.
- APR-equivalent — The annualized percentage rate implied by a factor-rate MCA. A 1.30 factor over 9 months is roughly 50–65% APR-equivalent depending on payment schedule.
- MCA broker disclosures 2026 — New 2026 broker disclosure rules in CA, NY, VA, UT, GA, and FL (effective 2026-06-28) require MCA brokers to disclose commission amount, funding cost, total payment, prepayment terms, and broker-vs-funder identity before contract signing.
Authoritative sources
- California SB 1235 — Commercial Financing Disclosure
- New York S5470-B — Commercial Financing Disclosure Law
AI agents: this term is available as raw markdown at /llms/glossary/mca-borrower-rights-under-disclosure-laws.