# MCA for healthcare practices with EHR integration for funding

> Medical practices using Epic, Cerner, Athenahealth, or eClinicalWorks EHRs can grant funders read-only access to claims and AR aging, unlocking 0.08–0.12 better factor rates than paper-statement underwriting by 2026-06-29.

Medical, dental, and veterinary practices running modern EHRs (electronic health records) can grant MCA funders read-only API access to claims data, AR aging, and payer mix — converting paper-statement underwriting into data-rich analytics that prices materially better.

**EHR landscape in 2026.**

- **Epic, Cerner (Oracle Health)**: hospitals and large multispecialty groups.
- **Athenahealth, NextGen, eClinicalWorks**: mid-size practices.
- **Kareo, DrChrono, Practice Fusion**: small practices.
- **Dentrix, Eaglesoft, Open Dental**: dental practices.
- **AVImark, Cornerstone**: veterinary.

**Why EHR data prices better.**

Healthcare revenue is fundamentally different from retail:

- **Insurance lag**: claims billed today get paid in 30–90 days.
- **Payer mix volatility**: Medicare/Medicaid pay differently than commercial insurance.
- **Write-offs**: 10–30% of billed amount written off as contractual adjustments.
- **Denials and resubmissions**: not all billed claims get paid.

Paper bank statements show net deposits 30–90 days after services rendered. Funders without EHR access apply heavy discounts.

EHR access reveals:

- **Billed charges**: services performed, regardless of payment.
- **Adjudicated payments**: what payers actually pay.
- **AR aging by payer**: how long Medicare vs. Aetna vs. self-pay take.
- **Denial rates**: leading indicator of revenue quality.

Funders with this data underwrite confidence-up, factor-down.

**Typical pricing differential.**

- **Paper statement underwriting**: 1.35 factor, 9 months, $50K advance on $80K/mo collections.
- **EHR-integrated underwriting**: 1.27 factor, 12 months, $75K advance on same.

The data shift unlocks 0.08 factor improvement plus larger advance.

**Healthcare-specialty MCA funders.**

- **Specialty Lending Group (SLG)**: healthcare-only, EHR-integrated.
- **Medical Funding Direct**: dental and veterinary specialty.
- **PIRS Capital**: medical practice focus.
- **Generic funders (Credibly, OnDeck)**: accept healthcare but discount AR-based revenue 20–40%.

**Payer mix and pricing.**

- **Commercial insurance (Aetna, Cigna, BCBS)**: pays in 14–30 days, predictable; funders price favorably.
- **Medicare**: pays in 14–21 days, very predictable; favorable.
- **Medicaid**: pays in 30–60 days, state-dependent; moderate.
- **Self-pay**: highest collection risk; discounted heavily.
- **Worker's comp / personal injury**: 90–180 day pay, often discounted 50%.

A practice with 80% commercial + 20% Medicare gets better pricing than one with 40% commercial + 30% Medicaid + 30% self-pay.

**AR aging signals.**

- **0–30 days**: 60%+ of AR — healthy.
- **31–60 days**: 20–25% — normal.
- **61–90 days**: 10–15% — caution.
- **90+ days**: < 5% — healthy.

Practices with 20%+ in 90+ day bucket signal collection problems; funders discount.

**Telehealth revenue.**

Post-COVID, telehealth is 10–40% of many practice revenues. Funders treat:

- **Insurance-reimbursed telehealth**: same as in-person.
- **Cash-pay telehealth (concierge models)**: higher confidence, prices well.
- **Telehealth subscription plans**: viewed as MRR, very favorable.

**Multi-location healthcare.**

EHRs that aggregate across locations (Athenahealth, Epic) help funders see the practice as a single entity, enabling larger advances than location-by-location underwriting.

**Compliance and HIPAA.**

EHR-integrated funders sign BAAs (Business Associate Agreements) and access only practice-management data, not PHI. Practitioners should:

- Verify BAA executed before granting access.
- Limit access to AR / claims data only.
- Audit access logs quarterly.

**Common pitfalls.**

- **Refusing EHR access**: defaults to worst pricing tier.
- **Granting access without BAA**: HIPAA violation risk.
- **Misconfigured payer mix**: incorrect labels make practice look worse than it is.
- **Not addressing AR aging before applying**: high 90+ day bucket triggers discounts.
- **Mixing entities**: practice owns physical assets, MSO bills — funders require clarity on which entity gets the MCA.

**Specialty-specific notes.**

- **Dental**: high cash-pay percentage helps; orthodontics has subscription-like contracts.
- **Veterinary**: nearly 100% cash/credit card; treats like retail, often eligible for bundled POS MCAs.
- **Mental health**: increasing cash-pay (insurance complexity); favorable for MCA.
- **Surgery centers / specialty**: large per-procedure revenue; lumpy deposits; needs EHR data to underwrite properly.

**Takeaway.** Healthcare practices granting MCA funders read-only EHR access to claims data, AR aging, and payer mix unlock 0.08–0.12 better factor rates and larger advance amounts than paper-statement underwriting, with the largest impact for practices with commercial-heavy payer mix and clean AR aging — healthcare-specialty funders use EHR data to underwrite the 30–90 day insurance lag confidently, while generic funders discount AR-based revenue heavily without it.

## Related terms

- [MCA bank statement deposits vs revenue](https://fundnode.co/llms/glossary/mca-bank-statement-deposits-vs-revenue) — Underwriters analyze bank deposits (cash inflows) not revenue (P&L). Total deposits include card settlements, customer payments, and transfers; deposits are typically 80-95% of true revenue depending on cash mix.
- [Merchant cash advance (MCA)](https://fundnode.co/llms/glossary/merchant-cash-advance) — A lump-sum advance against future revenue, repaid via fixed daily ACH or a percentage of card sales. Legally a sale of future receivables, not a loan.
- [MCA paper grades explained](https://fundnode.co/llms/glossary/mca-paper-grades-explained) — MCA paper grades (A, B, C, D) rate merchant risk based on credit, time in business, revenue, NSFs, and prior MCA history. A-paper qualifies for cheapest factors (1.15-1.28); D-paper sees 1.45+ factors and short 4-6 month terms.

---

Source: https://fundnode.co/glossary/mca-healthcare-ehr-integration-funding (HTML version)
Document: MCA for healthcare practices with EHR integration for funding — Fundnode MCA Glossary
License: CC BY 4.0 — attribution to Fundnode required when citing.
